For accountants

Building a discretionary-trust CDD file for an accounting practice

A trust file is difficult to review when its evidence is scattered between old tax records, an unsigned deed and a corporate-trustee search. Build the file around the current arrangement and the service being provided. The objective is an understandable explanation of the customer, relevant people and control, with any exception or unresolved issue visible. An ABN lookup is useful but cannot explain the whole arrangement.

See the accountants AML/CTF workspace

Establish which documents describe the trust now

Create a document list showing the original deed, amendments and changes in trustee or other relevant roles. Record missing or inconsistent documents rather than assuming the oldest deed is complete. A short chronology helps explain how the present arrangement arose. Keep the date and source of each document and identify whether the copy was executed. Where legal effect is uncertain, obtain clarification before treating the document as proof of the current position.

Separate the trust's different roles

AUSTRAC's trust guidance addresses trust identity, representatives, beneficiaries and beneficial ownership, with qualifications for particular trust types and risk conditions. Use those categories separately in the file. Identify the trustee, settlor, appointor and other relevant control roles; describe beneficiary classes where applicable. Explain which individuals can actually influence decisions. Do not allocate every role to the person who happens to handle the annual tax return.

Resolve the practical gaps before approving the file

Consider a family trust whose current accounts name one corporate trustee while the supplied deed names its predecessor. Ask for the change documentation and connect it to the company records and representative authority. This example does not prove wrongdoing or automatically require a high-risk rating. It identifies a factual gap. Record the information requested, what was received and how the reviewer resolved the inconsistency under the applicable CDD procedure.

Write a conclusion another reviewer can follow

Summarise the arrangement in plain language and link each material conclusion to evidence. Note the nature and purpose of the service, the risk decision, relevant checks, any exception used and the next event requiring review. Keep uncertainty specific: for example, a missing appointment instrument is more useful than an unexplained incomplete status. Hand the unresolved item to a named person with a clear restriction on work until it is resolved.

Official sources

Use these primary sources to confirm the current rules and apply them to your circumstances.

Sources checked .

Frequently asked questions

Does every beneficiary need identical verification?

No. Apply the current trust provisions, including the treatment of beneficiary classes and any relevant exceptions. Do not substitute one blanket rule for that assessment.

Does a family trust have shareholders?

The corporate trustee may have shareholders. Keep that company's ownership distinct from the trust's beneficiary and control arrangements.

Can the annual accounts replace the deed review?

Accounts may support your understanding, but they may omit powers, amendments or appointments relevant to the current trust arrangement.

Put it into practice

Cassandra AML turns these obligations into a working system: designated-service decisions, customer due diligence, screening, monitoring and reporting records — hosted in Sydney, free to start.

This guide is general information for Australian professionals. It is not legal advice and does not replace the AML/CTF Act, the AML/CTF Rules or AUSTRAC guidance. Confirm your specific obligations with AUSTRAC or a qualified legal adviser. See our editorial and correction standards.